This page presents the full CTSD map of self-determination domains and forms as a dedicated working map. It shows the internal structure of each domain and describes each form through its definition, healthy and distorted states, examples, interactions, self-check questions, and practices.
Step06 / 28Sections3NextSociety
01
Overview of the eight domains
The eight domains show that self-determination is not a single psychological or political phenomenon. It unfolds across interconnected layers of existence, inner state, thinking, body, relations, institutions, economy, and technology.
02
How to read the map
Each domain has a general function and an internal structure. Each form is described through a definition, a healthy state, signs of distortion, examples, links with other forms, self-check questions, and a small practical exercise.
03
Reading across domains
The domains are not closed compartments. Ontological ground affects mental and cognitive choices, biological limits change economic and technological decisions, and institutional and relational layers shape the conditions of public self-determination.
Canonical map
8 domains and 36 forms
Canonical public source for CTSD’s 8 domains and 36 forms of self-determination
D1
Ontological
Meaning, basis of existence, and deep questions of identity
The ontological domain concerns the foundations of human existence: being, meaning, values, and history. To self-determine here means to understand one’s life not merely as the result of circumstances, but as a responsible and meaningful course.
Open domainClose domain
The ontological domain is the deepest layer of CTSD. It asks not only what a person does, but from what ground a person lives, decides, relates, and assumes responsibility. In this domain, identity is formed through awareness of existence, the source of meaning, value boundaries, and the connected story of one’s life.
D1 internal structure
Ground of existenceBeingMeaningValuingNarrating
The question this domain addresses
This domain opens the foundational questions of human life: why live, what to choose for, what values deserve boundaries, and how to connect one’s past with the future. If this layer is weak, other domains may still contain activity, knowledge, or social roles, but they are harder to turn into a coherent direction.
Healthy state
In healthy ontological self-determination, a person does not need final answers to every question, but has an inner ground from which to stand in uncertainty. They distinguish external success from inner meaning, define a value line, and read their story not only as a sequence of events, but as a path of responsibility.
Signs of disruption
Disruption appears as emptiness of meaning, borrowed values, disconnection from one’s own story, or avoidance of existential questions. A person may still act efficiently, but may not know what they act for, or may easily adapt to environments that offer ready-made meanings.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Ontological grounding stabilizes emotion and will: when a person knows their axis of meaning, fear or pressure is less likely to become the source of decision.
D3 Cognitive
Thinking receives direction. Knowledge becomes not only information, but a means of understanding personal and public questions meaningfully.
D6 Institutional
The relation to institutions becomes more than obedience to rules: the person can ask what value order a structure preserves or disrupts.
Applications
reviewing personal life direction
value grounding for educational and leadership programs
long-term meaning check for public policy
D1.1 · Existential self-determinationAwareness of existence, life direction, and responsibility for being.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Existential self-determination is the human capacity to face the fact of one’s own being and not transfer responsibility for life direction entirely to circumstances, family, market, state, or accidental impulses. It begins with the question: how am I living as an existing and responsible being?
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person accepts that life is not fully controllable, but that position, choice, and responsibility do not disappear because of uncertainty. They can say what they are responsible before, what they cannot avoid, and in what direction they want to make their existence meaningful.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, a person may live only by flow, wait for external instruction, see themselves as a victim of circumstances, or cover the question of existence with busyness, consumption, a role, or a ready-made ideological answer.
Examples
A young person chooses a profession not only by market demand, but by asking what form of life that choice creates.
An organization leader checks a decision not only by profit, but by asking what kind of human and public existence the organization makes possible.
During a public crisis, a citizen does not wait only for instructions, but tries to understand the measure of their responsibility and real possibility for action.
Interactions
D1.2 Meaning-based self-determination
The existential question opens the need for meaning. Without responsibility for being, meaning easily becomes a borrowed slogan.
D2.4 Volitional self-determination
When a person accepts responsibility for existence, will gains a deeper ground and is not only the result of discipline or pressure.
D6.3 Civic self-determination
Responsibility for being can move beyond personal life and become a basis for public participation: why am I present in my community?
Self-check questions
Which decisions do I actually accept as my life responsibility, rather than only as imposed steps?
Which questions do I avoid through busyness, role, or external success?
What would change in my actions if I saw my life as a meaningful path, not only as a sequence of situations?
Small practice
Write one page titled “What am I responsible before now?” Do not write only wishes or goals. Separate three things: what I did not choose but carry, what I can choose now, and what consequence I am ready to accept.
D1.2 · Meaning-based self-determinationFormation of the source of meaning for actions and life course.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Meaning-based self-determination is the capacity to distinguish external goals from inner meaning and to connect one’s actions with questions worthy of time, effort, and responsibility. It is not the same as pleasure or success; meaning is the link through which action becomes a continuation of one’s own life.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can explain why they do their main work, what meaning it creates for themselves and others, and when a direction must change because its source of meaning has weakened. Meaning is not expected to arrive only from outside, but it is also not reduced to private desire.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, meaning is replaced by habit, social expectation, success metrics, or someone else’s story. A person may be very busy yet unable to see the meaningful link of their effort, or may abandon a choice at the first difficulty because the action lacks a deeper reason.
Examples
A student studies not only for a grade, but with a sense of what problem they want to become capable of addressing.
A parent choosing an educational environment asks not only what is useful, but what meaningful world that environment opens for the child.
A team starting a new project formulates its human or public significance beyond revenue and visibility.
Interactions
D1.1 Existential self-determination
Responsibility for being opens the question of meaning; without asking what one is responsible before, meaning often remains a pleasant phrase.
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
Meaning needs to be tested by thought, otherwise it can become self-deception or merely an emotional conviction.
D7.2 Work self-determination
Work can be sustained over time when it has not only an income link, but also a meaningful link with a person’s life.
Self-check questions
Which of my most time-consuming actions have clear meaning for me?
Which goals have I taken from my environment without checking whether they serve the meaning of my life?
What work or relationship has lost meaning, but I keep maintaining it through habit or fear?
Small practice
Choose one current obligation and write it in three layers: what result it produces, what value it protects, and what meaning it creates. If the third layer is empty, decide whether to reinterpret it, change its form, or let the obligation go.
D1.3 · Value-based self-determinationFormation of a hierarchy of values and principled boundaries.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Value-based self-determination is the capacity to consciously form a hierarchy of values: what is primary, what is secondary, what is unacceptable, and which boundaries are not for sale in exchange for benefit, fear, or convenience.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, values do not remain general declarations. They become criteria for choice, a language for boundaries, and a tool for orientation in conflicting situations. A person can admit that values sometimes collide and that a clear priority must be chosen within that collision.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, values become borrowed slogans or change according to interest and environmental pressure. A person may speak often about dignity, freedom, or justice, but have no value boundary at the moment of concrete choice.
Examples
A professional rejects a profitable order if it requires deceiving users or damaging public trust.
A citizen in a political choice distinguishes personal sympathy from the values that must sustain the long-term foundation of the state and society.
An organization defines its growth strategy not only through market opportunity, but also through a list of unacceptable practices.
Interactions
D1.2 Meaning-based self-determination
Meaning shows what a person acts for; values define the price at which action must not be taken.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
The relation to law becomes stronger when law is understood as a way to preserve a value order, not only as a mechanism of punishment.
D8.4 AI self-determination
In technological decisions, value boundaries prevent efficiency from replacing the human being, dignity, or responsibility.
Self-check questions
Which three values actually guide my decisions, not only my speech?
When did I last give up a value boundary because of convenience or fear?
What in my life or work must remain unacceptable even if it brings benefit?
Small practice
Make two columns: values in my speech and values in my choices. Next to each value, write one real decision where it appeared and one situation where it is at risk.
D1.4 · Narrative self-determinationA connected reading of one’s story, past, and future.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Narrative self-determination is the capacity to read one’s life story as connected: without hiding the past, cutting off the present, or imagining the future as an empty wish. It gives a language for understanding where one comes from, what knots one has passed through, and what story one wants to continue or change.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can see in their story not only harms or victories, but also learning, responsibility, and the possibility of change. They do not become a prisoner of the past, but they also do not build identity on denial of the past.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, the story becomes either a single victim story, a rigid myth of glory, or a set of disconnected episodes. Then it becomes difficult to see continuity across choices, and the same mistake is easily repeated while assuming each time begins from zero.
Examples
A person does not read a work failure only as defeat, but as a knot in the story where their choices, environmental limits, and next direction must be seen.
A community does not keep its painful past only as injury, but turns it into memory, learning, and responsibility for future institutions.
A family passes on generational stories not only as heroization or blame, but as material for understanding what to repeat, what to change, and what to heal.
Interactions
D1.1 Existential self-determination
The question of existence receives a temporal form: a person understands not only that they exist, but what story they stand within.
D5.5 Cultural self-determination
Personal story connects with language, memory, culture, and shared symbols.
D6.5 National self-determination
Public and national stories become sources of responsibility when they are not closed into worship of the past or victim identity.
Self-check questions
Do I tell my life story mainly as loss, struggle, growth, or a series of accidents?
Which past episode can I still not place within a connected story?
What story am I continuing without awareness, and what story do I want to begin consciously?
Small practice
Write a short account of one important life episode under three different titles: what happened, what I learned, and what responsibility was born. Compare which version opens future action, not only emotion.
D2
Mental
Emotional, psychological, personal, and volitional self-determination
The mental domain covers inner states, will, fears, resilience, and psychological orientation. Here self-determination is not the absence of emotions, but the capacity to recognize and govern them responsibly.
Open domainClose domain
The mental domain concerns a person’s governance of inner states: emotions, fears, psychological defenses, personal boundaries, and will. Here self-determination is measured not only by what a person thinks or declares, but by whether they can remain a subject when pressure, panic, desire, injury, or inner collapse tries to become the only source of decision.
D2 internal structure
Inner governanceFeelHoldDistinguishAct
What question the domain addresses
This domain asks how a person preserves inner freedom when emotion, fear, habitual defense, or environmental pressure attempts to become the sole source of decision. It connects the capacity to feel, psychological self-awareness, personal boundaries, and volitional consistency.
Healthy state
In healthy mental self-determination, a person neither denies emotion nor treats numbness as strength. They can recognize inner impulses, hold them without acting immediately, distinguish the person from their roles, and choose action aligned with values and responsibility.
Signs of distortion
Distortion appears as emotional explosion, long-term freezing, the governing role of fear, automatic defensive reactions, total identification with a role, or instability of will. A person may have correct ideas but lose inner governance at the decisive moment.
Interactions
D1 Ontological
The ontological ground provides a meaningful and value-based support so that emotion and fear do not become the final source of decision.
D3 Cognitive
Thinking helps name, analyze, and reconstruct inner modes, but without mental stability thought easily serves self-justification.
D5 Relational
The ability to keep boundaries, trust, and avoid collapse in relationships depends on the maturity of the mental domain.
Applications
support for personal crises and decisions
development of emotional and volitional capacities in education and leadership programs
management of trust, responsibility, and conflict in team environments
D2.1 · Emotional self-determinationRecognition, holding, and responsible expression of emotions.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Emotional self-determination is the capacity to recognize, name, hold, and responsibly express one’s emotions without suppressing them or becoming entirely governed by them. It turns emotion into information and energy, not an automatic command.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can distinguish emotion from fact, impulse from decision, and expression from harm. They can feel anger, fear, joy, or pain without those emotions erasing their values, relationships, and long-term responsibility.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, emotion either explodes into immediate reaction or is frozen and accumulated as inner tension. Then a person either harms themselves and others, or loses contact with real signals and lives in a mode of numbness.
Examples
During conflict, a person first names their anger and postpones harmful speech until they can speak about the problem.
A leader does not cover team tension with formal calm, but creates a safe form for hearing emotion and turning it into a decision.
A parent neither mocks nor amplifies a child’s fear, but helps name it and find a small practical step.
Interactions
D2.2 Psychological self-determination
Work with emotions reveals defense mechanisms and inner modes that are often hidden beneath emotional reactions.
D5.1 Interpersonal self-determination
Emotional maturity keeps boundaries in relationships without destroying connection.
D6.1 Professional self-determination
In professional settings, emotional governance helps preserve quality, trust, and decision responsibility under pressure.
Self-check questions
Which emotion do I most often confuse with fact or truth?
In what situation do I react immediately instead of holding and understanding the emotion?
What emotion do I usually suppress, and what effect does it have on my body, relationships, or decisions?
Small practice
At the end of the day, choose one strong emotional moment and write: what I felt, what fact was present, what interpretation I added, and what action I chose. The aim is not to judge the emotion, but to distinguish it from the decision.
D2.2 · Psychological self-determinationConscious governance of fears, defenses, and inner modes.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Psychological self-determination is the capacity to become aware of one’s fears, defenses, inner voices, and recurring modes, understanding when they protect and when they limit free choice.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can see their habitual defensive reaction and choose whether it is needed now or is already getting in the way. They do not identify themselves entirely with fear, injury, or an old defense mechanism.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, inner defenses become invisible authority. A person may experience every criticism as attack, every uncertainty as danger, or every intimacy as loss of control.
Examples
A person notices that they start justifying themselves during criticism and first tries to understand what danger they felt.
A team member does not leave the discussion after the first disagreement, but distinguishes the present issue from previous experience.
A teacher understands that a strong need for control comes from fear of error, not always from the need for discipline.
Interactions
D1.4 Narrative self-determination
Inner modes are often connected with knots in the life story, so understanding them requires seeing continuity with the past.
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
Thinking helps test the story of fear and distinguish real risk from psychological prediction.
D5.1 Interpersonal self-determination
Psychological defenses become especially visible in relationships when approaching, trusting, or setting boundaries.
Self-check questions
In which recurring situation do I act as if I am in danger even when the real danger is small?
What defensive form do I use: silence, attack, justification, withdrawal, control?
Which of my fears protects me, and which already limits my choice?
Small practice
Choose one recurring reaction and write its chain: trigger, body sensation, thought, defense, consequence. Then add one small alternative step that preserves safety without giving up choice.
D2.3 · Personal self-determinationDistinguishing the boundaries of personhood, roles, and identity.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Personal self-determination is the capacity to distinguish one’s personhood from roles, labels, expectations, and external evaluations. It keeps the question: who am I when I am not defined only by work, family position, public opinion, or a past label?
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can inhabit different roles: parent, professional, citizen, friend, leader, without any one of them swallowing the whole person. They can change roles, receive criticism, or lose status without total collapse of identity.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, the person either dissolves into a role or protects themselves with a rigid label. A person may see themselves only as a successful professional, victim, rescuer, leader, or outsider, and that identification limits growth.
Examples
After leaving a job, a professional can rebuild identity without measuring themselves only by the former position.
An activist does not identify their whole person with one struggle and can hear criticism without feeling personally destroyed.
A young person respects family expectations while distinguishing their own choice from the role assigned to them.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Values help distinguish the person’s core from roles that may change according to situation.
D5.1 Interpersonal self-determination
Personal boundaries in relationships make it possible to remain connected without losing identity.
D6.1 Professional self-determination
A professional role is healthy when it expresses the person’s capacities but does not become the only definition of the person.
Self-check questions
Which role in my life is so strong that when it is threatened I feel a collapse of identity?
What label do I continue to carry even though it no longer describes my real path?
Who am I outside the relationship, work, or status through which I usually present myself?
Small practice
Write ten versions of the sentence “I am more than...” using roles, labels, and expectations. Then choose three and write what real capacity or value remains when that role is removed.
D2.4 · Volitional self-determinationPreserving the inner source of action, decision, and consistency.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Volitional self-determination is the capacity to preserve the inner source of action: to make a decision, maintain direction, return to the choice, and act not only during emotional elevation or external pressure.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, will does not mean harsh self-suppression. It means connecting meaning, value, and action through small, consistent steps. A person can pause and revise, but also not lose the continuity of their choice.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, will may turn into impulsive bursts, harsh violence against oneself, or complete permissiveness. Then a person starts many things and finishes few, or finishes only at the price of exhaustion.
Examples
A person maintains a health decision not through one week of enthusiasm, but through small stable steps aligned with their life rhythm.
A team turns a strategic decision into recurring actions instead of leaving it as a statement.
A student does not abandon a difficult subject after the first failure, but changes method and maintains the learning direction.
Interactions
D1.2 Meaning-based self-determination
Will is stable over time when action is linked to meaning, not only to pressure or shame.
D2.1 Emotional self-determination
Emotional governance allows will not to depend only on mood or fear.
D7.1 Resource self-determination
Will must account for resources; otherwise consistency becomes self-exhaustion.
Self-check questions
Which choice do I repeatedly start but fail to maintain, and what inner source is missing there?
Does my will usually work from meaning, shame, fear, or external control?
What small step can preserve my decision without self-exhaustion?
Small practice
Choose one decision and define a seven-day minimum step, small enough to perform even on imperfect days. Each day note not only whether it was done, but which inner mode interfered.
D3
Cognitive
Thinking, knowledge, cognition, and methodological orientation
The cognitive domain is the capacity to think, understand, learn, decide, and orient oneself within complexity. To self-determine here means not acting through automatic assumptions, but consciously forming judgment.
Open domainClose domain
The cognitive domain concerns a person’s capacity to think, learn, know, work with facts, and choose methods. Here self-determination means not living only by ready-made opinions, information flow, or repetition of authority, but forming a responsible source of judgment, knowledge, and understanding.
D3 internal structure
Source of understandingLearnJudgeChoose methodProveQuestion
What question the domain addresses
This domain asks how a person distinguishes knowledge from opinion, fact from interpretation, method from habit, and worldview from accidental beliefs. It builds discipline of thinking, direction in learning, and a responsible relation to truth.
Healthy state
In healthy cognitive self-determination, a person learns consciously, builds opinions through reasoning, chooses methods according to the problem, does not confuse facts with desired conclusions, and can revise thinking in the face of new evidence.
Signs of distortion
Distortion appears as repetition of ready-made opinions, accumulation of information without understanding, blind acceptance of authority, improvisation instead of method, selective use of facts, or the belief that one’s opinion is already knowledge by itself.
Interactions
D1 Ontological
The ontological and value-based ground shows which questions knowledge is for and what boundaries thinking must preserve.
D2 Mental
Mental stability makes it possible to think not only from fear, injury, or defense, but from a position of real examination.
D8 Technological
In digital and AI environments, cognitive self-determination protects a person from blindness to information flow, algorithmic influence, and automated conclusions.
Applications
purposeful design of educational programs
improvement of research, analytical, and policy decision quality
critical orientation in media and AI environments
D3.1 · Educational self-determinationConscious choice of learning path and educational purpose.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Educational self-determination is the capacity to consciously choose the learning path, purpose, environment, and criteria, understanding not only what one studies, but why, for what, and what kind of person or professional is formed through that education.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, the learner does not view education only as a certificate, social obligation, or market demand. They can formulate their learning question, choose appropriate sources, evaluate progress, and connect learning with life, work, and public responsibility.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, education becomes passive consumption, diploma formalism, endless accumulation of courses, or repetition of someone else’s success model. A person may learn a lot without knowing for which question they are building knowledge.
Examples
A student choosing a profession brings together interest, capacity, public need, and the long-term form of life they want to build.
A professional learns a new skill not because it is trending, but by clarifying what problem it will help solve better.
A school designing a curriculum asks not only what material to cover, but what thinking and responsible person it wants to form.
Interactions
D1.2 Meaning-based self-determination
The educational path is stable when learning is connected with meaning, not only obligation or competition.
D3.3 Methodological self-determination
A learning purpose becomes real when the right method is chosen: how to learn, try, fail, and verify.
D6.1 Professional self-determination
Education is a basis of professional self-determination when it gives not only skills, but an understanding of work quality and responsibility.
Self-check questions
What question am I learning to answer now, and is it my question or only an environmental demand?
Is my main learning criterion a certificate, quick result, or real growth of capacity?
What knowledge am I accumulating without application, verification, or connection to my life?
Small practice
Choose one learning goal and formulate it in four sentences: what problem I want to solve, what I need to learn, how I will verify progress, and what change should appear in my behavior or work.
D3.2 · Thinking self-determinationFormation of one’s own thinking, judgment, and opinion.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Thinking self-determination is the capacity to form one’s own judgment by distinguishing opinion from fact, belief from evidence, and influence from a considered position. It prevents a person from becoming a mere repeater of the information environment or group opinion.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can ask, reason, listen to counterarguments, change opinion without identity collapse, and keep responsibility for their thinking. They do not rush to judge only by the first emotional reaction or the name of an authority.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, thinking becomes reaction, defense, or a marker of belonging. A person defends opinion as identity, selects facts according to the desired conclusion, and experiences disagreement as personal attack.
Examples
When discussing a political topic, a person first separates facts, interpretations, and their own value position.
Before a decision, a team deliberately seeks counterarguments to avoid groupthink.
A parent does not answer a child’s question only with a ready truth, but shows the path of thinking.
Interactions
D2.2 Psychological self-determination
Thinking becomes clearer when a person sees which opinion comes from fear, defense, or injury.
D3.4 Scientific self-determination
One’s own judgment becomes stronger when it learns to work with fact, evidence, and verification.
D6.3 Civic self-determination
Civic participation requires not only having an opinion, but being able to judge public facts and consequences.
Self-check questions
Which opinion do I defend more for identity than for truth?
When did I last change my opinion because of a good argument or new fact?
Which of my strongest beliefs are actually inherited from my environment?
Small practice
Take one strong opinion and write three columns: facts, interpretations, and value position. Then find one counterargument and try to formulate its strongest honest version.
D3.3 · Methodological self-determinationCapacity to choose and construct a method appropriate to the problem.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Methodological self-determination is the capacity to choose, construct, and change a method according to the nature of the problem. It asks not only what to do, but how to know, test, measure, compare, and reach a reliable result.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person understands that different problems require different methods. They do not apply the same tool everywhere and can define steps, criteria, data sources, and moments of review.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, method is replaced by intuition, random attempts, copy-paste solutions, or formal procedures. As a result, a person may work a lot without knowing what is verified, what is assumed, and why the method does not produce results.
Examples
A researcher first defines the question and data sources, and only then chooses interview, survey, or analysis.
An organization tests a new program through a small pilot with clear metrics instead of scaling it immediately.
A teacher changes the method for the same material after seeing that the class problem is not motivation, but a wrongly built concept.
Interactions
D3.1 Educational self-determination
A learning path is effective when the learner knows not only what to learn, but by what method to build capacity.
D3.4 Scientific self-determination
A scientific approach requires transparency of method, repeatability, and awareness of limits.
D7.1 Resource self-determination
Method must account for time, energy, and means; otherwise good intention does not become real result.
Self-check questions
By what method am I solving my important problem now, and why this method?
Where am I replacing method with busyness or intuition?
How will I know that my chosen method works and does not only keep me occupied?
Small practice
Choose one problem and write a method card: question, data or fact, steps, success criterion, review date, possible limitation. After one week, return and change the method according to the result.
D3.4 · Scientific self-determinationResponsible relation to knowledge, fact, and evidence.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Scientific self-determination is a responsible relation to knowledge, fact, evidence, uncertainty, and verification. It does not require everyone to be a scientist, but it does require not confusing faith, opinion, experience, and proven knowledge.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person respects facts even when they are inconvenient, distinguishes data from conclusion, understands the limits of uncertainty, and is ready to change position before better evidence. They do not turn science into blind authority, but also do not equate it with any opinion.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, a person either rejects evidence when it contradicts desire, or uses science as a stamp of authority without understanding method. Equally dangerous is selective use of data to confirm a desired story.
Examples
When making a health decision, a person distinguishes personal experience from clinical evidence and does not build a general conclusion from one case.
A policy analyst publishes not only the conclusion, but also data sources and methodological limits.
A student reading a scientific article asks what question is asked, what method is used, what is proven, and what remains open.
Interactions
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
Personal judgment becomes responsible when it learns to submit to fact and the criterion of evidence.
D3.3 Methodological self-determination
A scientific approach cannot exist without a clear method, and the method must show its limits.
D8.2 Data self-determination
In the world of data, scientific self-determination helps distinguish measurement, interpretation, model, and manipulation.
Self-check questions
Which belief would be hard for me to change even if I received good evidence against it?
Which of the data I use are facts, which are interpretations, and which are assumptions?
In what topic do I use science as authority without understanding the method?
Small practice
Choose one claim you believe and find at least two sources for and against it. For each, note what data it uses, what method, what limitation, and what conclusion can be honestly drawn.
D3.5 · Philosophical self-determinationExamination of foundational questions, concepts, and worldview.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Philosophical self-determination is the capacity to stand before foundational questions: what are the human being, freedom, truth, justice, the good, time, death, society, and technology. It forms worldview depth without which knowledge may remain a tool, but not meaningful orientation.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can ask about their concepts, see their limits, compare worldviews, and not fear difficult questions. They do not use philosophy as vague speech, but as a means of clarifying, deepening, and thinking with responsibility.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, philosophical language can become empty abstraction, cynicism, endless relativization, or repetition of ready-made ideology. A person may speak in large concepts without connecting them to real choice and life.
Examples
In a discussion about AI, a person asks not only what is possible, but what can be transferred from the human being and what must not be transferred to the machine.
In a policy discussion, the philosophical question opens what image of justice is hidden beneath the proposed policy.
In a personal crisis, a person tries to understand not only what to do, but what understanding of life, death, freedom, and responsibility is at work.
Interactions
D1 Ontological
Philosophical self-determination deepens ontological questions and gives conceptual language for thinking about meaning and value.
D3.4 Scientific self-determination
Science answers what is verifiable; philosophy asks what verification, truth, and limits mean.
D8.4 AI self-determination
In AI environments, philosophical questions protect a person from mistaking technical possibility for human purpose.
Self-check questions
Which large concepts do I use without understanding them precisely: freedom, justice, development, human being, state?
Which important decision in my life rests on an unexamined worldview assumption?
Which question do I avoid because it is too difficult or threatens my usual belief?
Small practice
Choose one concept, such as freedom or justice, and write three definitions: how I understand it, how the opposite position understands it, and what real decision changes because of the definition.
D4
Biological
Body, health, energy, and vital environment
The biological domain covers the body, health, energy, vital resources, and the human relation to the environment. Here self-determination begins with recognizing the body as a source of responsibility and information.
Open domainClose domain
The biological domain concerns a responsible relation to the body, health, energy, nutrition, nature, and immediate vital environment. Here self-determination begins from the awareness that the human being is not only idea, role, or will: the person is embodied, and freedom also depends on vital rhythms, care, environment, and natural limits.
D4 internal structure
Vital groundCareNourishConnect with natureShape environment
What question the domain addresses
This domain asks how a person lives in their body and environment, not only on them. It connects responsibility for health, energy governance, nutritional behavior, relation with nature, and the shaping of spaces where a person lives and works.
Healthy state
In healthy biological self-determination, a person does not treat the body only as a tool, illness only as malfunction, food only as pleasure or control, and nature only as resource. They can listen to bodily signals, connect care with long-term life, and shape their environment so that it supports vital balance.
Signs of distortion
Distortion appears as neglect of the body, delayed relation to health, constant depletion of energy, using food for self-soothing or self-punishment, loss of connection with nature, and environments that constantly overstimulate, exhaust, or alienate the person.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Body and emotions constantly affect each other: sleep, food, movement, and environment change the real possibility of mental stability.
D7 Economic
Decisions about resources, work, and consumption directly affect the body, health, and ecological footprint.
D8 Technological
The digital environment changes sleep, attention, movement, and bodily rhythms, so biological self-determination is also a question of technological boundaries.
Applications
long-term planning of personal health and energy
vital ergonomics of educational and work environments
human-centered evaluation of ecological and urban policies
D4.1 · Health self-determinationA subject-based relation to body, health, and care.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Health self-determination is the capacity to relate to one’s health not as a passive patient or unlimited controller, but as a responsible subject: listening to the body, using knowledge, turning to professionals, and making long-term decisions of care.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, prevention, treatment, rest, and asking for help are not experienced as weakness. A person distinguishes self-care from self-treatment, bodily signal from panic, and medical decision from random advice.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, health is either ignored until crisis or becomes a source of constant control and fear. A person may live cut off from the body and ignore signals, or turn every signal into a threat.
Examples
A person checks health regularly not from fear, but as part of responsibility for life.
A professional includes rest in heavy work as a condition of quality, not as guilty pleasure.
A family makes decisions during illness by combining medical information, care, and real resources.
Interactions
D2.1 Emotional self-determination
In health matters, fear and hope need to be recognized so that they do not replace facts and care decisions.
D3.4 Scientific self-determination
A responsible relation to medical information requires distinguishing fact, evidence, and professional limits.
D7.1 Resource self-determination
Maintaining health requires time, money, energy, and support, not only desire.
Self-check questions
Do I mostly ignore, fear, or act responsibly toward my health?
Which bodily signal have I ignored for a long time or exaggerated too much?
What small preventive step can I take before the issue becomes a crisis?
Small practice
Create a 30-day health card: sleep, movement, water, necessary medical or professional step, rest. Each day note not perfection, but the link between bodily signal and chosen response.
D4.2 · Nutritional self-determinationConscious regulation of food, energy, and bodily needs.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Nutritional self-determination is the capacity to regulate food as a matter of energy, care, culture, and bodily need, not only pleasure, punishment, control of appearance, or market signal.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person distinguishes hunger, habit, emotion, and social pressure. They can eat according to life rhythm, health, cultural environment, and real resources without turning food into a measure of guilt or self-worth.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, food becomes self-soothing, self-punishment, obsession with control, or unconscious consumption. A person may eat through screen, stress, shame, or chance, losing connection with the body’s real need.
Examples
During heavy workdays, a person builds a minimal healthy eating rhythm in advance so stress does not decide everything.
A family revises food habits not in the language of shame, but in the language of energy, health, and shared care.
A young person does not repeat every diet trend, but learns to listen to the body and verify information sources.
Interactions
D2.1 Emotional self-determination
Much nutritional behavior is linked with emotional regulation, so bodily hunger must be distinguished from emotional need.
D3.4 Scientific self-determination
Information about food requires checking sources and evidence because the field is full of simplified promises.
D7.5 Consumer self-determination
Food is also a field of market and advertising where need, desire, and manipulation must be distinguished.
Self-check questions
When do I eat from bodily hunger, and when from stress, boredom, or shame?
Do my food decisions come more from care, control, or chance?
Which advertising or social image affects my eating without my noticing it?
Small practice
Keep a one-week food observation journal without counting calories. Record hunger level, emotion, environment, chosen food, and energy result. At the end, find one recurring pattern and change only one small thing.
D4.3 · Ecological self-determinationResponsible connection with nature, resources, and vital environment.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Ecological self-determination is the capacity to see oneself as connected with nature, resources, and living systems, not only as consumer or observer. It asks what trace my life leaves and what responsibility I have toward the systems that sustain life.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, relation to nature is not left only at the level of pleasant feeling or slogan. A person can see ecological consequences in daily decisions, consumption, mobility, water, energy, and waste, and choose responsible steps at their own scale.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, nature is viewed only as resource or as a distant topic for which only the state, companies, or activists are responsible. The opposite distortion is also possible: a weight of guilt that makes the person inactive.
Examples
A citizen changes home and work habits through small measurable steps: energy, water, waste, instead of only sharing ecological slogans.
A community connects tree planting with a long-term plan for water, soil, and maintenance, not a one-day action.
A business considers not only cost and sales in product design, but also the full cycle of materials and waste.
Interactions
D7.5 Consumer self-determination
Consumption decisions are daily ecological choices, even when presented only as individual convenience.
D6.3 Civic self-determination
Ecological responsibility often requires public participation, demand for rules, and community action.
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Relation to nature shows whether values apply only to humans or also to the conditions that sustain life.
Self-check questions
Which decisions in my daily life have the largest ecological trace?
Where do I perceive nature only as resource or background?
What small recurring step can become a real part of my ecological responsibility?
Small practice
Choose one week and measure three things: energy or fuel, water, and waste. Do not start with a large promise; find one habit that can change without collapsing the whole life and keep it for one month.
D4.4 · Environmental self-determinationConscious shaping of living and working environment.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Environmental self-determination is the capacity to consciously shape one’s living and working environment: light, sound, air, movement, objects, digital flows, and social rhythms so that they support life, attention, and relationships.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person understands that environment is not neutral. It can help concentration, rest, movement, communication, and recovery, or constantly distract, compress, overstimulate, and deplete. A person begins from the accessible scale: desk, room, schedule, team space, community.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, a person adapts to the environment until harm becomes invisible. Noise, clutter, poor light, lack of movement, constant notifications, or toxic work rhythm are experienced as normal.
Examples
A person arranges the desk and notifications so that deep work is actually possible.
A school treats classroom light, seating, and movement moments as part of educational quality.
A team redesigns meeting rhythm so the environment does not produce constant urgency and fatigue.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Environment affects emotion, stress, and will, so inner regulation often begins with regulation of external conditions.
D3.1 Educational self-determination
The learning environment determines whether attention and memory are supported or constantly disrupted.
D8.1 Digital self-determination
The digital environment is part of the real vital environment: notifications, feeds, and screens shape bodily and attentional rhythm.
Self-check questions
Which element of my environment drains my attention or body every day?
What small change can I make in light, sound, air, movement, or digital flow?
What kind of person does my work or home environment force me to become?
Small practice
Choose one space: desk, room, or phone home screen. In 20 minutes remove three distracting elements, add one restoring element, and set one rule that preserves the environment for a week.
D5
Relational
Connections, belonging, communication, trust, and cultural relation
The relational domain covers family, friendship, community, trust, reciprocity, and boundaries. Self-determination here does not mean isolation, but the capacity to remain a subject within relationships.
Open domainClose domain
The relational domain concerns a person’s connections with other people, family, community, language, culture, faith, and forms of belonging. Here self-determination means being in connection without losing identity, and being separate without destroying relationship.
D5 internal structure
Connection and boundaryTrustConsentBelongRememberInterpret
What question the domain addresses
This domain asks how a person forms relationships that contain reciprocity, respect, identity, and belonging. It connects interpersonal boundaries, bodily and sexual dignity, ethnic and religious belonging, and cultural language.
Healthy state
In healthy relational self-determination, a person can trust without blindness, set boundaries without alienation, belong without becoming an object, and continue heritage without mechanically repeating it.
Signs of distortion
Distortion appears as dependency, isolation, violation of consent, label replacing identity, blind repetition of community or culture, or the opposite: shame and denial of one’s belonging.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Relationships open emotions, fears, and defenses, while mental stability determines whether connection becomes a place of growth or collapse.
D6 Institutional
Relational connections often take the form of rules, rights, roles, and public norms.
D1 Ontological
Belonging becomes healthy when it is connected to meaning and values, not only origin or group pressure.
Applications
educational work on relationships and conflicts
programs for community trust and belonging
public dialogue on cultural, religious, and identity questions
D5.1 · Interpersonal self-determinationPreserving boundaries, reciprocity, and identity in human relations.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Interpersonal self-determination is the capacity to preserve boundaries, listen to the other, build reciprocity, and keep one’s identity within love, friendship, family, work, or community.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can say yes and no, trust and verify, approach and step back without turning connection into dependence or control.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, the person dissolves into the relationship or protects themselves through isolation, manipulation, guilt, avoidance, or fear of closeness.
Examples
A person in a close relationship can disagree without treating disagreement as abandonment.
A community preserves belonging through language, memory, and responsibility rather than only symbols.
An educational setting discusses interpersonal self-determination through dignity, boundaries, and mutual respect.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Relational choices reveal emotions, fears, and defenses; mental maturity helps keep connection from becoming collapse.
D1 Ontological
Belonging becomes stable when it is connected with meaning, value, and responsibility.
D6 Institutional
Many relational questions require rights, roles, rules, and public norms to protect dignity and reciprocity.
Self-check questions
In which relationship do I lose my boundaries in order to keep connection?
Where do I set boundaries sharply because I lack a healthier form?
What does reciprocity mean in this relationship?
Small practice
Choose one important relationship and write three columns: what I give, what I receive, and what boundary must become clear. Then formulate one calm sentence about that boundary.
D5.2 · Sexual and gender self-determinationDignified and consensual positioning in bodily, sexual, and gender fields.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Sexual and gender self-determination is the capacity to preserve dignity, consent, boundaries, and a responsible language of identity in bodily, sexual, and gender experience, without violence, shame, or objectification.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, body and sexuality are neither commodity nor shame nor someone else’s territory of control. Consent, safety, dignity, and speech about boundaries are possible.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, coercion, silenced disagreement, objectification of the body, control through shame, irresponsible use of sexuality, or rigid labeling of identity appear.
Examples
A person in a close relationship can disagree without treating disagreement as abandonment.
A community preserves belonging through language, memory, and responsibility rather than only symbols.
An educational setting discusses sexual and gender self-determination through dignity, boundaries, and mutual respect.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Relational choices reveal emotions, fears, and defenses; mental maturity helps keep connection from becoming collapse.
D1 Ontological
Belonging becomes stable when it is connected with meaning, value, and responsibility.
D6 Institutional
Many relational questions require rights, roles, rules, and public norms to protect dignity and reciprocity.
Self-check questions
Where do I remain silent about a boundary because of shame, fear, or fear of losing connection?
Which images about my body came from external pressure rather than my conscious position?
Do I understand consent as formal permission or as continuing respect?
Small practice
Write a personal boundary map: what is comfortable, what is uncertain, and what is unacceptable. It does not need to be shown to anyone; the goal is to clarify your own language.
D5.3 · Ethnic self-determinationConscious, non-objectified living of ethnic belonging.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Ethnic self-determination is the capacity to live ethnic belonging consciously as a connection of language, memory, history, pain, creativity, and responsibility, not as blind pride, shame, or a label defined against others.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person belongs to their ethnic world without humiliating others and without turning belonging into a product or display. Heritage can be loved critically and transmitted creatively.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, ethnic belonging becomes aggressive exclusion, a closed victim identity, folkloric surface, political instrument, or source of shame and disconnection.
Examples
A person in a close relationship can disagree without treating disagreement as abandonment.
A community preserves belonging through language, memory, and responsibility rather than only symbols.
An educational setting discusses ethnic self-determination through dignity, boundaries, and mutual respect.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Relational choices reveal emotions, fears, and defenses; mental maturity helps keep connection from becoming collapse.
D1 Ontological
Belonging becomes stable when it is connected with meaning, value, and responsibility.
D6 Institutional
Many relational questions require rights, roles, rules, and public norms to protect dignity and reciprocity.
Self-check questions
Do I live my ethnic belonging mainly as pride, pain, shame, or responsibility?
What am I actually transmitting to the next generation: language, memory, fear, or living culture?
Where does my belonging become an identity defined against others?
Small practice
Choose one family or community story and write it in three layers: fact, feeling, responsibility. Then mark what should be transmitted and what should be reinterpreted.
D5.4 · Religious self-determinationResponsible positioning toward faith, doubt, ritual, and religious belonging.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Religious self-determination is the capacity to take a responsible position toward faith, doubt, ritual, sacredness, community, and religious heritage, without blind submission, cynical denial, or humiliation of another person’s faith.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person distinguishes faith from social habit, ritual from mechanical performance, doubt from hostility, and community from control.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, religion can become governance through fear, external piety, manipulation through guilt, intolerance, or empty denial that does not understand what it rejects.
Examples
A person in a close relationship can disagree without treating disagreement as abandonment.
A community preserves belonging through language, memory, and responsibility rather than only symbols.
An educational setting discusses religious self-determination through dignity, boundaries, and mutual respect.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Relational choices reveal emotions, fears, and defenses; mental maturity helps keep connection from becoming collapse.
D1 Ontological
Belonging becomes stable when it is connected with meaning, value, and responsibility.
D6 Institutional
Many relational questions require rights, roles, rules, and public norms to protect dignity and reciprocity.
Self-check questions
How much of my faith or unbelief is a conscious position, and how much is inherited reaction?
Which ritual do I perform without understanding, and what question can I ask about its meaning?
Does my religious position help me become more responsible, or only separate me from others?
Small practice
Choose one faith or worldview statement and write: what I inherited, what I personally understand, what question I still have, and what behavior follows from it.
D5.5 · Cultural self-determinationAppropriation and reinterpretation of cultural heritage, language, symbols, and taste.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Cultural self-determination is the capacity to appropriate and reinterpret language, heritage, art, symbols, taste, and everyday forms, making culture a living environment of creation rather than only a museum, consumption, or display sign.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can love their culture without freezing it, learn from other cultures without losing self-possession, and create new forms that connect memory with the present.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, culture becomes a surface symbol, closed traditionalism, or total self-rejection. It may be consumed as image without living language or responsibility.
Examples
A person in a close relationship can disagree without treating disagreement as abandonment.
A community preserves belonging through language, memory, and responsibility rather than only symbols.
An educational setting discusses cultural self-determination through dignity, boundaries, and mutual respect.
Interactions
D2 Mental
Relational choices reveal emotions, fears, and defenses; mental maturity helps keep connection from becoming collapse.
D1 Ontological
Belonging becomes stable when it is connected with meaning, value, and responsibility.
D6 Institutional
Many relational questions require rights, roles, rules, and public norms to protect dignity and reciprocity.
Self-check questions
Do I live cultural belonging as a living language or only as a symbol?
Which cultural form do I repeat without understanding its meaning?
What new form can I create that connects heritage with present life?
Small practice
Choose one cultural element: word, song, food, ritual, or image. Write its source, personal memory, present meaning, and one new use that makes it living rather than merely decorative.
D6
Institutional
Roles, norms, responsibility, law, and public participation
The institutional domain is the environment of education, law, culture, governance, and organizations. The central question is whether structures preserve and expand human subjecthood or replace it.
Open domainClose domain
The institutional domain concerns a person’s relation to roles, rules, profession, law, citizenship, politics, the state, and public responsibility. Here self-determination means not remaining only a private person, but understanding how one acts within the structures that shape common life.
D6 internal structure
Public role and orderWorkPreserve rightsParticipateInfluenceCarry statehood
What question the domain addresses
This domain asks how a person becomes a responsible participant in systems that contain roles, obligations, rights, power, and public consequences. It connects professional quality, legal subjecthood, civic participation, political position, and national-state responsibility.
Healthy state
In healthy institutional self-determination, a person neither blindly obeys the structure nor rejects it entirely. They understand their role, rights, limits, capacity for influence, and the responsibility born from participation in public life.
Signs of distortion
Distortion appears as mechanical performance of roles, ignorance of rights, civic passivity, vulnerability to political manipulation, a relation to the state based only on demand or only on submission, and transfer of professional or public responsibility to others.
Interactions
D1 Ontological and value ground
Institutions are healthy when rules preserve values and meaning, not only formal order or self-preservation of power.
D5 Relational
Institutions organize relationships by turning trust, boundaries, belonging, and mutual obligations into stable forms.
D7 Economic
Work, property, taxes, resources, and public goods connect institutional and economic self-determination.
Applications
programs for professional ethics and responsibility
civic education and tools for public participation
value-based evaluation of state and community governance
D6.1 · Professional self-determinationConscious choice of professional role, work quality, and responsibility.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Professional self-determination is the capacity to consciously choose and perform a professional role, understanding the meaning of work, quality criteria, the person served, boundaries, and responsibility for consequences.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a professional knows whom the work serves, what makes it good, where ethical limits stand, and when learning or refusal is required.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, profession becomes mechanical role performance, a mask of authority, market compulsion, or the only source of self-worth.
Examples
A person connects professional self-determination with concrete duties, not only with declaration.
An organization makes rules clear and verifiable so that responsibility does not dissolve into status.
A community discusses a shared issue through facts, rights, roles, and consequences, not only through emotion.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Institutional position requires a value boundary: what must not be done even for benefit or power.
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
Public decisions require the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, and manipulation.
D5 Relational
Institutions protect relationships when they turn trust and reciprocity into stable rules.
Self-check questions
Whom does my work serve, and what consequence does it leave?
Which professional boundary must not be given up even under pressure or benefit?
What skill or knowledge must I renew so that my role does not become mechanical?
Small practice
Write one page of professional responsibility: the addressee of my work, three quality criteria, three unacceptable practices, and one learning step for the next month.
D6.2 · Legal self-determinationAwareness of rights, duties, and legal subjecthood.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Legal self-determination is the capacity to see oneself as a legal subject with rights, duties, boundaries, and means of protection, not only as someone afraid of law or trying to bypass it.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person knows basic rights and duties, understands contract, consent, evidence, and responsibility, and uses law to protect just order.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, law is seen only as distant punishment, a game to bypass, or a tool of the powerful; rights and duties remain unclear.
Examples
A person connects legal self-determination with concrete duties, not only with declaration.
An organization makes rules clear and verifiable so that responsibility does not dissolve into status.
A community discusses a shared issue through facts, rights, roles, and consequences, not only through emotion.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Institutional position requires a value boundary: what must not be done even for benefit or power.
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
Public decisions require the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, and manipulation.
D5 Relational
Institutions protect relationships when they turn trust and reciprocity into stable rules.
Self-check questions
Which of my rights or duties do I actually not know?
When do I treat law as an obstacle rather than a language of just relation?
Which document, contract, or consent should I read more responsibly?
Small practice
Choose one current legal relation: work, service, data, or lease. Write your right, duty, risk, evidence to keep, and whom you can ask for advice.
D6.3 · Civic self-determinationPositioning in public participation and civic responsibility.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Civic self-determination is the capacity to see oneself as a participant in public life, not only as a user, complainer, or observer. It includes responsibility toward community, state, public goods, and common rules.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a citizen distinguishes private dissatisfaction from public problem, understands their scale of participation, and can demand accountability while respecting common rules.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, citizenship becomes passive waiting, complaint only, private-interest demand, or withdrawal from public responsibility.
Examples
A person connects civic self-determination with concrete duties, not only with declaration.
An organization makes rules clear and verifiable so that responsibility does not dissolve into status.
A community discusses a shared issue through facts, rights, roles, and consequences, not only through emotion.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Institutional position requires a value boundary: what must not be done even for benefit or power.
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
Public decisions require the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, and manipulation.
D5 Relational
Institutions protect relationships when they turn trust and reciprocity into stable rules.
Self-check questions
In which public problem am I only dissatisfied but not yet participating?
How does my civic position appear outside elections?
What small public action can I take based on fact, proposal, or cooperation?
Small practice
Choose one community or public issue and write: fact, whom it affects, which body is responsible, what proposal I have, and what small participation I can make within 14 days.
D6.4 · Political self-determinationConscious formation of political position, participation, and influence.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Political self-determination is the capacity to consciously form a political position, understand power, interests, ideas, and consequences of decisions, and participate in influence without becoming a blind instrument of manipulation.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person distinguishes political values from party loyalty, fact from propaganda, support from idolization, and criticism from destruction.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, politics becomes tribal belonging, fear management, indifference, cynicism, or permanent enemy language.
Examples
A person connects political self-determination with concrete duties, not only with declaration.
An organization makes rules clear and verifiable so that responsibility does not dissolve into status.
A community discusses a shared issue through facts, rights, roles, and consequences, not only through emotion.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Institutional position requires a value boundary: what must not be done even for benefit or power.
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
Public decisions require the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, and manipulation.
D5 Relational
Institutions protect relationships when they turn trust and reciprocity into stable rules.
Self-check questions
Is my political position based on values, facts, fear, group belonging, or private interest?
Which sources form my political picture, and what do they hide?
Which position can I revise without feeling identity loss?
Small practice
Choose one political claim and write: what value it protects, what facts support it, whose interest it expresses, what consequences it has for different groups, and what counterargument exists.
D6.5 · National self-determinationSubject-based understanding of national belonging and state responsibility.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
National self-determination is the capacity to understand national belonging and state responsibility as a subject-based position: shared carrying of language, history, security, institutions, territory, culture, and future.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, national belonging is not only emotional slogan, origin label, or identity built against others; it becomes shared responsibility for language, institutions, security, and future.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, national self-determination becomes empty pathos, closed victim story, aggressive exclusion, demand from the state without participation, or shame and denial of belonging.
Examples
A person connects national self-determination with concrete duties, not only with declaration.
An organization makes rules clear and verifiable so that responsibility does not dissolve into status.
A community discusses a shared issue through facts, rights, roles, and consequences, not only through emotion.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Institutional position requires a value boundary: what must not be done even for benefit or power.
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
Public decisions require the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, and manipulation.
D5 Relational
Institutions protect relationships when they turn trust and reciprocity into stable rules.
Self-check questions
How does my national belonging appear in real actions, not only speech?
Which national story do I repeat without understanding its consequences?
Which institution, language, security, or public good am I ready to practically sustain?
Small practice
Write a national responsibility card: language, memory, state, security, institution, generations. For each, name one real action possible in the next 30 days.
D7
Economic
Resources, work, property, finance, and consumption
The economic domain covers work, property, productivity, professional choice, and material conditions. Here self-determination means a real capacity to act, not only desire or adaptation to the market.
Open domainClose domain
The economic domain concerns a person’s relation to resources, work, property, money, risk, consumption, and forms of value creation. Here self-determination means not being carried only by market pressure, scarcity, debt, desire, or income flow, but consciously governing the material conditions that make life, relationship, and public participation possible.
D7 internal structure
Material responsibilitySee resourcesWorkPreservePlanChoose
What question the domain addresses
This domain asks how a person distinguishes need from desire, income from value, work from self-depletion, property from responsibility, and consumption from a substitute for identity. It connects material limits, the real possibility of freedom, and organization of the future.
Healthy state
In healthy economic self-determination, a person knows resources and limits, places work within life, uses money as a tool, connects property with care and responsibility, and subordinates consumption to value-based choice.
Signs of distortion
Distortion appears as constant fear of scarcity, unplanned consumption, total loss of identity through work, neglect of debt and risk, accumulation of property without responsibility, or accepting market signals as one’s own desire.
Interactions
D4 Biological
Economic decisions affect body, health, sleep, food, and energy, so material efficiency cannot ignore vital limits.
D6 Institutional
Work, taxes, contracts, property, and public goods connect economy with law and institutions.
D1 Value ground
Money and resources become tools of self-determination only when subordinated to meaning and value boundaries.
Applications
personal and family financial literacy
design of work-life balance
assessment of socioeconomic impact in public policy
D7.1 · Resource self-determinationConscious management of resources, limits, and opportunities.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Resource self-determination is the capacity to see, calculate, and consciously allocate one’s resources: time, energy, attention, relationships, money, knowledge, and environmental opportunities.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person does not act as if resources are endless or entirely absent. They distinguish real limits from habitual fear and connect resources to priorities.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, scarcity fear or careless spending of time, energy, and money makes decisions reactive and mismeasures what is actually available.
Examples
A person connects resource self-determination with a concrete plan, not only desire or anxiety.
A family discusses material decisions through need, risk, value, and long-term consequences.
An organization accounts not only for income, but for sustainability of people, resources, and public trust.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Economic choice reveals real values through what a person gives money, time, and space to.
D4 Biological
Material decisions must account for body, health, energy, and vital limits.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Contracts, debts, property, and obligations require legal clarity.
Self-check questions
Which resource do I misjudge most: time, energy, money, attention, relationships?
Where do I make a bad decision from scarcity fear?
Which resource must I protect so that an important goal does not become self-depletion?
Small practice
Create a one-week resource card: time, energy, money, attention. Next to each major action, write not only the cost but also the recovery step.
D7.2 · Work self-determinationCapacity to determine the place of work within life, value, and boundaries.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Work self-determination is the capacity to determine the place of work within one’s life, values, relationships, health, and public usefulness. Work should be not only income, but activity with boundary, quality, and meaning.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person works responsibly without making work their whole identity, and understands what work gives to and takes from life.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, work becomes the only source of self-proof, escape, exploitation, permanent busyness, or avoidance of responsibility.
Examples
A person connects work self-determination with a concrete plan, not only desire or anxiety.
A family discusses material decisions through need, risk, value, and long-term consequences.
An organization accounts not only for income, but for sustainability of people, resources, and public trust.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Economic choice reveals real values through what a person gives money, time, and space to.
D4 Biological
Material decisions must account for body, health, energy, and vital limits.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Contracts, debts, property, and obligations require legal clarity.
Self-check questions
What does my work give to my life, and what does it take from it?
Where do I use work to replace meaning, relationship, or self-worth?
What boundary must I set so that work does not destroy its own value?
Small practice
Write a work-balance card: income, meaning, growth, health, relationships, boundary. For each, note the current state and one change for the next two weeks.
D7.3 · Property self-determinationResponsible relation to possessions, assets, and property.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Property self-determination is the capacity to build a relation with possessions, assets, space, and material goods as matters of care, use, responsibility, and transfer, not only accumulation or status.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person knows what belongs to them, why they keep it, what duty it creates, and how it serves life, family, community, or future.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, property becomes a marker of self-worth, a storehouse of fear, a tool of control, or an ignored burden.
Examples
A person connects property self-determination with a concrete plan, not only desire or anxiety.
A family discusses material decisions through need, risk, value, and long-term consequences.
An organization accounts not only for income, but for sustainability of people, resources, and public trust.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Economic choice reveals real values through what a person gives money, time, and space to.
D4 Biological
Material decisions must account for body, health, energy, and vital limits.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Contracts, debts, property, and obligations require legal clarity.
Self-check questions
Which of my possessions serves life, and which has become burden or status sign?
Which property question lacks legal or relational clarity?
What do I want to transmit: only assets, or also a culture of use and responsibility?
Small practice
Choose one asset and write: what it is for, what value it has, what duty it creates, whom it affects, and what must be clarified legally or within the family.
D7.4 · Financial self-determinationFinancial organization of cash flows, risks, and the future.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Financial self-determination is the capacity to organize cash flows, debts, savings, risks, and future financial decisions so that money serves life instead of governing it through fear or chance.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person knows income, expenses, debt, risk, and a minimum safety layer, and can speak about money without shame.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, money becomes permanent anxiety, a silenced topic, immediate pleasure, or an instrument of power while debt and risk remain unseen.
Examples
A person connects financial self-determination with a concrete plan, not only desire or anxiety.
A family discusses material decisions through need, risk, value, and long-term consequences.
An organization accounts not only for income, but for sustainability of people, resources, and public trust.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Economic choice reveals real values through what a person gives money, time, and space to.
D4 Biological
Material decisions must account for body, health, energy, and vital limits.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Contracts, debts, property, and obligations require legal clarity.
Self-check questions
Do I actually know my monthly cash flow: income, debt, obligations, savings?
Is my main emotion around money fear, shame, control, or freedom?
What financial risk am I ignoring because it is uncomfortable to think about now?
Small practice
Create a simple 30-day financial card: all inflows, fixed expenses, variable expenses, debts, and a small safety reserve. The goal is visibility, not self-judgment.
D7.5 · Consumer self-determinationDistinguishing consumption, need, desire, and value-based choice.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Consumer self-determination is the capacity to distinguish need, desire, advertising signal, social comparison, and value-based choice. It makes consumption a conscious tool rather than a substitute for identity or emptiness.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person can buy, use, and refuse while understanding what need is met and what effect the choice has on finances, environment, and identity.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, consumption becomes quick self-soothing, status competition, treatment for boredom, or the direct product of algorithms and advertising.
Examples
A person connects consumer self-determination with a concrete plan, not only desire or anxiety.
A family discusses material decisions through need, risk, value, and long-term consequences.
An organization accounts not only for income, but for sustainability of people, resources, and public trust.
Interactions
D1.3 Value-based self-determination
Economic choice reveals real values through what a person gives money, time, and space to.
D4 Biological
Material decisions must account for body, health, energy, and vital limits.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Contracts, debts, property, and obligations require legal clarity.
Self-check questions
Which recent purchases were real needs, and which were emotion or comparison?
What am I trying to feel or show through consumption?
Which advertising or algorithmic signal often governs my desire?
Small practice
For one week, before each non-essential purchase write: need, desire, emotion, source of influence, consequence. At the end, choose one consumption habit to change.
D8
Technological
Digital environment, data, algorithms, and AI
The technological domain concerns digital environments, tools, automation, and artificial intelligence. CTSD’s criterion is whether technology expands the human capacity for decision or replaces and weakens it.
Open domainClose domain
The technological domain concerns a person’s relation to the digital environment, data, algorithms, and artificial intelligence. Here self-determination means not becoming merely an object of devices, platforms, feeds, measurements, or automated recommendations, but preserving the source of choice, privacy, attention, responsibility, and human decision.
D8 internal structure
The human in technologyKeep boundariesUnderstand dataSee influencePreserve decision
What question the domain addresses
This domain asks how a person lives in the technological environment without losing attention, subjecthood over personal data, the source of choice, and responsibility for decisions. It connects digital behavior, data rights, algorithmic influence, and boundaries of cooperation with AI.
Healthy state
In healthy technological self-determination, a person uses technology as tool and environment, but does not transfer value-based choice to it. They know digital boundaries, understand data traces, recognize algorithmic steering, and treat AI output as material to verify, not final authority.
Signs of distortion
Distortion appears as being governed by constant notifications, unconscious disclosure of personal data, formation of desires and opinions by feeds, blind trust in AI responses, or replacing human responsibility with technological efficiency.
Interactions
D3 Cognitive
In digital and AI environments, the need for thinking, fact-checking, and method increases because information flow is fast and often invisibly steered.
D4 Biological
Screens, notifications, and feeds affect sleep, attention, movement, and bodily rhythms.
D6 Legal and institutional
Data, privacy, AI responsibility, and platform power require legal and institutional awareness.
Applications
digital hygiene and attention governance
data privacy and consent policy
responsible AI use in education, work, and governance
D8.1 · Digital self-determinationConscious governance of digital presence, boundaries, and behavior.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Digital self-determination is the capacity to consciously govern digital presence, time, attention, boundaries, communication, and behavior online. It asks whether I use the digital environment or the environment uses my attention.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person knows where they are digitally present, what they publish, and how notifications, feeds, and messages shape attention.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, digital life becomes constant distraction, comparison, disappearing time, unlimited availability, or a performance stage for identity.
Examples
A person connects digital self-determination with concrete rules of use, not only convenience.
A team sets transparent rules for data, AI tools, and responsibility for results.
A school teaches not only how to use technology, but how to understand its influence on attention, choice, and dignity.
Interactions
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
The technological environment requires the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, automated recommendation, and one’s own judgment.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Privacy, consent, data, and responsibility require legal clarity.
D4 Biological
Screens and digital flows affect sleep, body, attention, and recovery.
Self-check questions
Who or what governs my day: my decision or the notification stream?
On which digital platform do I lose time, attention, or self-worth?
What boundary would make digital presence serve life rather than replace it?
Small practice
For one week measure screen time, number of notifications, and aimless scrolling moments. Then turn off three unnecessary notifications and set two clear digital time windows.
D8.2 · Data self-determinationSubject-based position toward data flows, privacy, and control.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Data self-determination is the capacity to understand what data about oneself is collected, by whom, for what purpose, with what consent, and with what consequence. It makes data a matter of subject rights, not an invisible technical detail.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person asks why data is needed, what is stored, for how long, with whom it is shared, and how consent can be withdrawn or limited.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, data is disclosed unconsciously, consent becomes a formal checkbox, privacy becomes obscure, and measurement becomes control or manipulation.
Examples
A person connects data self-determination with concrete rules of use, not only convenience.
A team sets transparent rules for data, AI tools, and responsibility for results.
A school teaches not only how to use technology, but how to understand its influence on attention, choice, and dignity.
Interactions
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
The technological environment requires the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, automated recommendation, and one’s own judgment.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Privacy, consent, data, and responsibility require legal clarity.
D4 Biological
Screens and digital flows affect sleep, body, attention, and recovery.
Self-check questions
What data about me is collected by the services I use every day?
Where did I give consent without understanding the consequence?
What data do I not want to trade for convenience or a free service?
Small practice
Choose three core apps and check privacy settings: location, contacts, microphone, camera, tracking, data sharing. In each, disable at least one unnecessary permission.
D8.3 · Algorithmic self-determinationRecognition of algorithmic influence and preservation of the source of choice.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
Algorithmic self-determination is the capacity to recognize how algorithms arrange information, suggest choices, amplify desires, and form opinions while preserving one’s own source of choice.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person knows that the feed is not a random world but a selected and optimized environment, and asks what is shown, hidden, and encouraged.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, algorithmic environment is confused with the whole of reality; feed-generated anger, desire, fear, or opinion is experienced as independent choice.
Examples
A person connects algorithmic self-determination with concrete rules of use, not only convenience.
A team sets transparent rules for data, AI tools, and responsibility for results.
A school teaches not only how to use technology, but how to understand its influence on attention, choice, and dignity.
Interactions
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
The technological environment requires the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, automated recommendation, and one’s own judgment.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Privacy, consent, data, and responsibility require legal clarity.
D4 Biological
Screens and digital flows affect sleep, body, attention, and recovery.
Self-check questions
Which opinion or desire may feel mine but be formed by repetition in the feed?
Which sources do I not see because the algorithm does not bring them to me?
On which platform do I most lose my own source of choice?
Small practice
For one week, use three sources outside the feed for one important topic. Note what changed and what the algorithm repeatedly showed or hid.
D8.4 · AI self-determinationPreserving human decision and responsibility in cooperation with artificial intelligence.Open detailed cardClose detailed card
Definition
AI self-determination is the capacity to preserve human decision, value boundaries, verification, authorship, and responsibility for consequences when cooperating with artificial intelligence. AI can help thinking, but cannot replace the responsible subject.
Healthy state
In a healthy state, a person gives AI a clear task, verifies output, keeps ethical decisions human, understands limits, and marks where AI helped.
Distorted state
In a distorted state, AI becomes blind authority, a way to escape responsibility, a mechanical replacement for people, or a shortcut around values in the name of speed.
Examples
A person connects ai self-determination with concrete rules of use, not only convenience.
A team sets transparent rules for data, AI tools, and responsibility for results.
A school teaches not only how to use technology, but how to understand its influence on attention, choice, and dignity.
Interactions
D3.2 Thinking self-determination
The technological environment requires the capacity to distinguish fact, interpretation, automated recommendation, and one’s own judgment.
D6.2 Legal self-determination
Privacy, consent, data, and responsibility require legal clarity.
D4 Biological
Screens and digital flows affect sleep, body, attention, and recovery.
Self-check questions
Which decision should I not transfer to AI even if it can answer quickly?
How do I verify AI claims, sources, and assumptions?
Who carries responsibility if a decision made with AI assistance is wrong?
Small practice
Choose one AI-assisted work product and create a verification card: task, AI role, checked sources, final human decision, possible harm, responsible person.